Back to Projects

Team Name:

Bytes & Brains


Team Members:


Evidence of Work

A Better Way to Look at the ACT Wellbeing Framework

Project Info

Team Name


Bytes & Brains


Team Members


Mukund , Dibin , Jasmin Zhou , Xin , Xinyue Li , Nay Chi , Shelly

Project Description


Problem

Under the ACT Domestic Violence Wellbeing indicator, the ACT community's attitude towards violence against women shows increasing rejection of domestic and sexual violence, based on data from the NCAS mobile survey. However, as evidenced by domestic violence offence reports from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, why is violence against not only women, but across categories only increasing? If we only look at data right now on the dashboard, we might think that we don't have a problem in domestic violence at all, when it could be quite the opposite...

The current ACT Wellbeing Framework, primarily informed by the Living Well in the ACT Region survey, often uses data sources and visualisations that do not fully capture the complexity and diversity of wellbeing in Canberra. As a result, key wellbeing indicators are often incomplete or misleading, offering limited insights for policymakers. When the data doesn't quite match up with the actual experiences of Canberrans, it can lead to a less complete or oversimplified picture of the region's wellbeing. This makes it harder to make the best decisions and allocate resources where they’re truly needed.

Our Solution

poster

Our solution is a proposal that establishes a holistic framework to improve the relevance, context quality, and representativeness of the data used in the ACT Wellbeing Framework. This involves enhancing current data points with additional external sources—both subjective and objective—revising survey questions, and adjusting how data is presented on the wellbeing dashboard. By providing a fuller, more accurate picture of the real-life experiences of Canberrans, this framework will enable better-informed, evidence-based policymaking. Ultimately, the project aims to increase transparency, improve service delivery, and lead to more targeted interventions that address the actual needs of the community, resulting in a higher quality of life across the ACT region.

We present this framework briefly in our poster:
We dive deeper into each individual wellbeing indicator and provide analysis and recommendations in our comprehensive report:

Community Feedback Form

We also include a sample community feedback webpage for the dashboard.

Motivation: A simple community feedback form is essential for capturing real-time, actionable insights from residents about their experiences and perceptions of wellbeing. This direct input allows the wellbeing dashboard to remain responsive and relevant to the evolving needs of the community, ensuring that the data and indicators accurately reflect the lived experiences of Canberrans.

Usefulness: By integrating a feedback form, the wellbeing dashboard can gather valuable opinions on the effectiveness of current indicators, highlight areas for improvement, and identify emerging issues that may not be captured by existing data sources. This iterative feedback loop enhances the dashboard's accuracy and relevance, supports more informed policymaking, and fosters greater community engagement and trust in the decision-making process.

For the feedback form, proof of work, and other project details, please see our github repository


#wellbeingframework #datadrivendecisionmaking #communityengagement #publicpolicy #surveyimprovement #diversecommunities #datarelevance #inclusivedata #civicengagement #evidencebasedpolicy

Data Story


In the heart of Canberra, the ACT Wellbeing Dashboard serves as a vital tool for understanding the quality of life across our community. However, as the needs and experiences of Canberrans evolve, the challenge remains to ensure that this dashboard reflects the true state of wellbeing. To address this, a new initiative is underway to incorporate a simple yet powerful community feedback form, aiming to refine and enhance our wellbeing indicators.

Looking at the Wellbeing dashboard

While digging into the wellbeing dashboard, we felt that its structure and domains were a comprehensive and good representation of many facets of wellbeing, however after digging deeper, we realised that for some indicators, the actual data presented graphically on the dashboard failed to fully represent the context of that wellbeing indicator and could often be misleading, leaving out important issues and populations of concern.

This discrepancy highlights a critical gap: while the dashboard provides a broad overview, it sometimes overlooks the nuanced realities of certain wellbeing indicators. Important details, such as specific community needs or emerging trends, may be missing, leading to incomplete or skewed insights. Addressing these issues requires a more detailed and contextually aware approach to data presentation. By refining the dashboard to better reflect the complexities of each indicator and incorporating feedback from diverse populations, we can enhance its accuracy and relevance. This will ensure that the dashboard not only provides a comprehensive view of wellbeing but also effectively informs policy decisions and community support efforts.

Thus, we developed our framework: Relevance, Context Quality, and Representativeness.

Using the Framework

Using the framework, we analysed the data represented under each wellbeing indicator and attempted to patch the gaps case by case using alternate internal ACT Government resources or external Australian studies, our final analysis and recommendations covered in our report.

Our report includes not only external dataset recommendations, but additionally we propose some new and enhanced survey questions that may be either used to improve the Living Well in the ACT Region survey or added to a new survey to fill these context gaps and provide a more inclusive, unbiased, and complete view of wellbeing in Canberra.

Final Thoughts

Our overall proposal is to provide a helpful framework to help the ACT take a critical lens into the ACT Wellbeing Framework dashboard to identify information gaps, misleading data, and irrelevant data to improve the helpfulness and comprehensiveness of the dashboard in order to build towards a platform that policymakers have confidence in and can inform their decision making. There is still a lot more to be completed, and we recognise the limitations of our analysis and of the current data that we have accessible to, but our hope is that by exposing the current limitations of the dashboard, we can provide a more inclusive and faithful picture of wellbeing in the ACT to better inform progress in wellbeing across all sectors and background of people and lift their quality of life to make sure no-one is left behind.


Evidence of Work

Video

Homepage

Project Image

Team DataSets

Access to justice: meeting the need of ‘missing middle’

Description of Use The current metric under factor 'Access to Justice and restorative practice' is the percentage of court matters finalised within 12 months of lodgement including civil and criminal cases, which is a objective metric. We peopose that can be improved by introducing subjective data such as the perfentage of Australians did not seek professional assistance for legal issues and their reasons.

Data Set

ANU Constitutional Referendum Survey

Description of Use The current metric and data about people's feeling about whether their voice and perspectives matter is collected by questionnaire, resulting a subjective factor. We propose including objective measurements that assess factors such as voter turnout, accessible via Election 2020 Statistics via the ACT government databases, cultural and ethnic representation in advisory bodies, and surveys such as the ANU Constitutional Referendum Survey, which additionally is relevant for the factor Valuing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and recognising our Traditional Custodians.

Data Set

Election 2020 statistics

Description of Use The current metric and data about people's feeling about whether their voice and perspectives matter is collected by questionnaire, resulting a subjective factor. We propose including objective measurements that assess factors such as voter turnout, accessible via Election 2020 Statistics via the ACT government databases, cultural and ethnic representation in advisory bodies, and surveys such as the ANU Constitutional Referendum Survey, which additionally is relevant for the factor Valuing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and recognising our Traditional Custodians.

Data Set

Canberra light rail customer satisfaction survey

Description of Use we recommend incorporating external data sources such as the ACT City Services Satisfaction Report and the Canberra Light Rail Customer Satisfaction Survey to provide a more comprehensive view of commuting patterns and pain points. This integration of diverse datasets will support data-driven strategies to optimise commuting efficiency and reduce travel time.

Data Set

ACT city services satisfaction report

Description of Use we recommend incorporating external data sources such as the ACT City Services Satisfaction Report and the Canberra Light Rail Customer Satisfaction Survey to provide a more comprehensive view of commuting patterns and pain points. This integration of diverse datasets will support data-driven strategies to optimise commuting efficiency and reduce travel time.

Data Set

Proportion of regular clients aged 15 years and over who had their height and weight measurements recorded in their GP record within the previous 12 months, by PHN, July 2022:

Description of Use We recommend not only rely on people's subjective view on whether they are in a healty weight, but also objective data from doctor records.

Data Set

Changes in Modern social styles

Description of Use We use this data to prove they should consider online social connection as part of social connection

Data Set

Suicide & self-harm monitoring

Description of Use We use this data to prove the make up for the subjective data they are using to measure people's mental health.

Data Set

Record Crime-Victims - Victims of family and domestic violence related offences:

Description of Use We use this data to prove that the subjective data in ACT weelbeing dashboard is biased.

Data Set

ACT Wellbeing Data Dashboard

Description of Use This is the official dataset of ACT weelbeing frame work.

Data Set

All Wellbeing Measures

Data Set

Challenge Entries

Innovating Wellbeing Measurement – Uncovering New Connections

We want to explore different ways to link data and outcomes to domains and indicators under the <a href="https://www.act.gov.au/wellbeing/wellbeing-framework/domains-and-indicators"> ACT Government’s Wellbeing Framework.</a> Exploring external data sources can provide broader insights into the factors influencing our wellbeing, and improve its measurement.

#Exploring new ways to look at societal wellbeing

Eligibility: No restrictions. Participants can be from any jurisdiction and are encouraged to be creative and use any legal datasets in applying the wellbeing framework.

Go to Challenge | 17 teams have entered this challenge.

Civic participation for a more resilient, cohesive democracy.

How can we help more people to understand their democracy, have an opportunity to participate in civic life, contribute to their community, and/or feel a sense of belonging and responsibility?

#Civic Participation

Eligibility: Open to everyone. Submissions should use at least one government data source.

Go to Challenge | 27 teams have entered this challenge.